19 Jan 2026

Scoring vendors without a beauty contest

A working presentation with printed pages on the table

Vendor days in Taipei conference hotels reward the team that can light a room. That is a skill. It is not the skill that finishes a cutover at 03:00 when the plant MES refuses a payload. PageFlow Core’s Cloud Cutover Decision Studio uses a scorecard with four columns only: reference of a similar cutover in this industry, named kill-criteria, who stays on site after go-live, and the price of saying no to a scope change.

Demo environments are discounted to zero unless they run on a copy of the buyer’s data. Slide counts are not scored. A specialist integrator with an ugly deck and a retired application list can beat a global firm that arrives with a “value tree.”

The political problem is that beauty contests feel fair: everyone sat through the same three hours. A narrow scorecard feels rude. Rude is cheaper than a second integrator hired to undo the first. If procurement policy mandates weighted criteria in a 20-row sheet, keep the sheet for the file and run our four columns in the forum that actually decides.

← Journal